 |
 |  |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |  |  |  | Bob Wideman's
Genesis 33% Waco

Several in the club have asked about the progress on the Genesis 33% Waco. During yesterday’s “snow day” I had time to put the pieces together and take some photos. For size reference, the plane is sitting on an 8 foot pool table! When I got the 3W 157 engine and 32” prop I thought they looked huge. However, when installed in this airframe the engine and prop almost seem too small (look at the inside-the-cowl photo)! Basically the N-struts and Cowl need to be finished, the fuselage remains to be covered, the trim colors must be applied, the Solartex covering has to be sealed with polyurethane, and the servos & electronics must be installed. The kit arrived in May of 2007, and I suppose I’ve put an average of 10 hours per week into the construction so far (probably about 400 hours total to this point). I estimate another 100 hours until the test flights. Some specific comments are provided below. This is a “builder’s kit” that requires experience and patience. Don’t go for this type of kit unless you really enjoy the process of constructing airframes from ply, spruce and balsa. The supplied CD, instructions and plans are very clear in most cases. In a few instances I relied on past experience to interpret the drawings or intended outcomes. I used Gorilla glue for most aspects of the construction – this is great stuff that gives very strong joints without a lot of weight. The kit arrives as a lumberyard in a big box. The laser cutting of formers and ribs was absolutely outstanding. The wings are framed-up in jigs, and they came out absolutely straight. At the time of assembly shown in the photos, wing incidences and alignment were just about perfect – all within 1/16 inch for comparisons of left & right sides. In fact, the dimensions and angles for the “N” struts on the left side are virtually identical to those on the right side. The fuselage is framed up as a slab-sided rectangle of very stout laser-cut plywood, which makes it easy to build it square. Then the half-moon formers are glued on and the stringers applied to round it out. Makes a very strong and straight fuselage! I had a tough time fitting the fiberglass parts (tail fairings, back and front turtle decks, wing fairings, nose ring). Lots of fitting, sanding, filling and “massaging” to get these parts to blend into the wooden framework. This was the most frustrating aspect of the construction, but in the end everything turned out smooth and seamless. To add strength, the center sections of both wings were entirely covered with .75 oz fiberglass cloth. I also fiberglassed the leading edge “D” tubes of all wings, the firewall area, and the balsa-sheeted components of the fuselage. The framework was sprayed with white primer, to assist in the finish sanding steps, but also to prevent the wood grain etc. from showing through the semi-opaque covering. Balsarite adhesive goes on top of the primer, then Solartex Cub Yellow. Solartex is great to cover with – shrinks great around compound curves - but it needs the Balsarite to stick well to the wood framework. After the trim color has been applied (have not decided on the trim color or scheme, yet) the Solartex must be sealed with polyurethane or acrylic spray. As shown in the photos, the weight is between 46 and 47 lbs; flying weight (dry) should be right at 50 lbs. The plans state the weight should be “48.87” lbs (my bathroom scale doesn’t give that level of precision). The plane now balances somewhat nose-heavy – that should even out after the fuselage is covered and the elevator servos are installed in the tail. Specifications: Genesis 33% Waco YMF-5 Current Weight: 47 lb (target weight = 50 lb) Fuselage Length = 91 inches Wingspan (Top) = 120 inches Wing Area = 3,966 sq inches Wing Loading = 26 oz/square foot (cub-like) Engine: 3W 157XiB2 (17.7 HP) Prop: 3W 32X10 Sullivan Skylite 7” wheels w. aluminum hubs Hitec 5955TG servos (1 on each elevator, 1 on each aileron, 2 ganged for the rudder) self-sdjusting servo tray for rudder Futaba T12 FGA 2.4 GHz radio & receiver Smart-Fly Power Expander MZ Smart-Fly super switches Fromeco Li-Ion batteries (2 @ 2400 for servos, 1 @ 4800 for ignition & smoke) Sullivan Sky Writer smoke system
|  |  |  |  | |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |  |  |  | Update -- February 21, 2008 -- Update
I thought you might like to see photos of the new 3W "stump puller" being broken in for the Waco. manual for the 3W 157 recommends using a 32:1 mix of premium gas:ashless oil (I used Lawn Boy) to run the engine on a test stand at 2,000 to 2,500 RPM for 4 hours. The photos show my Ozark "test stand". The new 3W ignition module can take the unregulated voltage from the Li-Ion battery pack. The manual also recommends doing the break-in without any mufflers. Well, I don't know how deep into the Black Forest them German boys have to go to do that type of unmuffled break-in, but I did find out that a 157 cc engine is REALLY LOUD without the mufflers, even at 2,000 RPM! I tried it for <30 seconds, stopped the motor and put on the mufflers.
If that restricted the break-in, too damn bad!
After the first 2 hours I adjusted the low end needle setting to get a reliable 1,200 RPM, and the high end needle was adjusted slightly rich to give 4,800 RPM.
After 3 hours I got a reliable idle at 1,000 RPM (really just putting along w/o loading up), and the high end -still slightly rich- gave 5,000 RPM. Per instructions, did not leave it at peak for more than 10 seconds at a time. now has 4 hours and 2.5 gallons of bench time. Hand-starts easily with 2 to 3 flips, hot or cold. Transitions smoothly from idle to 5,100 RPM.
Time to bolt it to the plane and finish the break-in while flying! am tentatively planning to test-fly the Waco in May. |  |  |  |  | |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |  |  |  |
Genesis 33% Waco Test Flight is a Success!
After weeks of preparation and guestimating about the set-up for the test flight, the Waco YMF5 was flown successfully this Saturday morning (7/19/2008). This test flight was an all-out heart-pounding adrenaline rush! After hundreds of hours of building time and lots of $$$ invested, I hoped everything would go as smoothly as possible ? and it did go much better than I ever could have anticipated.
Prior to the test flight I was very concerned about the final weight of this airframe: 62 lbs empty! 68 lb with fuel! I built the plane pretty much according to plans with the materials provided, but I added 2 lbs by fiberglassing the leading edges of all wings as well as fiberglassing the center wing sections (1.2 oz cloth applied with 1 coat of 50% thinned epoxy surfacing resin; no substitute for strength in the center sections!). I also added at least a pound by applying custom 2 mil vinyl graphics from Cajun R/C Specialties (www.cajunrc.com) ? take your time to apply them and they will look absolutely great!
The balance w/o fuel was perfectly horizontal when suspended at the CG point shown in the plans, but I wanted to have a little nose-down posture for the test flight. To achieve that, I removed the smoke system (pump, tank and tubing saved 14 oz of weight), moved all battery packs to just behind the firewall, and screwed 1.5 lb of lead weight to the front of the firewall. Now the plane ?balanced? with about 5 degrees nose down without fuel. It was definitively >10 degrees nose-down when 48 oz of fuel was added. Perfect for a test flight: nose heavy is easier to control than tail heavy, except possibly during landings.
Based on previous experience with the flying characteristics of large-scale bipes (the Balsa USA 1/3rd scale Fokker DVII and Nieuport 28C), I knew their flat-bottom wings cause these planes to climb steeply with full throttle. This is just like a full-size aircraft in which forward throttle = climb and back throttle = descent. HOWEVER, I?ve found that throttle-sensitive pitch adjustments are murder to decipher during a test flight ? the ballooning up with a nose-up attitude on takeoff plus the resulting apparent lack of ?elevator neutral? adds a lot of unneeded stress trying to control and trim out the airplane. The CURE is to put down thrust in the motor ? which is NOT called for in the Genesis plans or instructions. I added the 2 degrees of right thrust which is called for in the instructions to offset engine torque, and then I decided to add about 2 degrees of down thrust by inserting washers as needed behind the engine mounts of the 3W-157XiB2. I also added about 1 degree of down trim to the elevator to help keep the nose down on takeoff, and 1 degree of right rudder + 1 degree of right aileron trim to counter the anticipated engine torque. Both of my Balsa USA bipes had needed down-thrust, down elevator trim, and right rudder + right aileron trim ? and I am absolutely certain the wing and stab incidences were built per plans & instructions. I used the Aileron-to-Rudder mix to add 23% rudder movement to assist the ailerons = about 1 inch of rudder deflection with full deflection of the ailerons (works great with the Balsa USA bipes). Ailerons were set with differential: 2 and ¼ inches up, 1 inch down at normal rate, add ½ inch to both at high rate (bipes often need as much aileron throw as you can get, and mixing in rudder helps to hold the tail up during a coordinated, slow aileron turn). Elevator was 2 inches up or down a normal rate, 2.5 inches both ways at high rate. Rudder is 4 inches each way with full deflection. All hinge gaps were sealed during covering. The radio is a brand new 2.4 GHz Futaba T12FGA, servos are all new HiTec HS5955TGs, Batteries include one 4800 LiIon (ignition and smoke; full direct battery voltage to the 3W ignition module) and two 2400 LiIons thru two separate HD switches into a Smart-Fly SuperReg (set for 5.8 volts) and then into the receiver through a Smart-Fly PowerExpander 14MZ (constant voltage to the receiver, separate constant voltage to each servo). I added -20% expo to all controls (except throttle) to soften the midpoints.
Time to fly! New airframe, new engine, new radio! Major adrenaline rush ? I truly regretted the 3 cups of coffee consumed earlier. And it was hot and humid by 11 AM ? tough to keep the sweat out of my eyes. What a wonderful hobby ? where else can we get this type of heart-pounding excitement? The engine had a 3W 32 x 10 inch wood prop, a 4.5 inch MPI spinner, and it had been ?stump-run? with 3 gallons of 32:1 gas. It idled reliably at 900 rpm, throttled up to a peak of 5,200 rpm, and had a smooth, effortless transition between idle and full throttle. I set the low-end idle to 1,100 rpm and the high end was set slightly rich at 5,100 rpm. Range check with the engine on had been performed previously at home according to the Futaba?s manual ? excellent!
Taxi tests were surprising for such a heavy airframe. Ground handling was superb ? just like a big trainer. A few test runs down the runway showed that the tail comes up smoothly at about 25% throttle, and the mains lifted about an inch from the runway at about 33 to 50% throttle ? I quickly throttled back and ?landed?. Taxied back to retighten the flying wires and prop bolts. All looked OK. The wind direction and speed were unsettled, gusting at about 5 to 10 mph ? mainly directly down the runway from the south, but occasionally coming from due west.
Waited for wind directly down the runway from the south, and slowly advanced the throttle. The takeoff roll was perfect, liftoff was at about 50% throttle, and climbout was effortless at 100% throttle. I had too much down trim in the elevator ? required several circuits around the field to add lots of up-trim and stop fighting the tendency for the nose to drop. Also too much right rudder and aileron trim ? by about half. Eventually I had the plane trimmed out for effortless, hands-off straight-and-level flight at about 50% to 66% throttle ? and it was not pitch-sensitive as I varied the throttle between 30% and 100%; down-thrust does work!
The Waco flew very scale-like at 50% throttle. It undoubtedly will be faster and aerobatic at 100% throttle ? but I did not try loops or rolls, and flew mostly at 50% throttle. It climbs quickly at 100% throttle and a slight amount of up-pressure on the elevator stick. Definitely need to reduce the elevator throw and/or add more expo to the elevator because pitch/elevator control was VERY sensitive. Aileron turns were authoritative with perfect rudder mixing. The rudder mix kept the tail up perfectly during slow speed majestic aileron turns. I won?t change any of that!
I flew about 20 circuits around the field at 200? altitude with my fingers and knees shaking badly ? in anticipation of the landing. While up high I throttled back to check the stall speed. The nose lifted a little (too much down-thrust?) and it slowed down but kept flying at a nice landing speed into the wind. TIME TO LAND. How can we possibly expect to land a 65 lb airplane without disaster? Will it slow down too quickly, stall and fall out of the sky like a brick? Will I have to come in hot, fly it onto the runway and risk ripping out the mains? HERE GOES! I felt a nice 10 mph breeze coming directly down the runway from the south. Throttled back on the downwind leg to about 30% throttle at about 100? altitude, used the ailerons to make a nice nose down sweeping base turn toward the north end of the runway, leveled out into the wind and pulled the throttle back to landing-idle at about 75? altitude. OOPS ? the nose went up! We absolutely DO NOT want to be low and slow with the nose up! Pushed the nose down with the elevator, and the plane entered a nice gentle descent with full rudder authority to keep it in the middle of the runway. At about 1 foot off the runway I flared to a perfect slow-speed touchdown (maybe 15 to 20 mph?) on the main gear. The tail wheel dropped instantly, the plane did not bounce, and then the Waco simply rolled about 10 feed in the grass and came to a stop. What absolutely great slow-speed characteristics ? I had authoritative elevator, aileron and rudder control all the way to touchdown. What a nice handling aircraft!
It took about 30 minutes to stop shaking and burn off the adrenaline. No doubt about it - as the folks at Genesis say, this Waco FLIES LIKE A BIG GLORIFIED CUB. The 3W 157 is more than enough power for my flying style. Decisions: decrease the elevator throw, slightly decrease the down-thrust; and, take at least a half-pound of lead off of the firewall? Time to see about getting this plane certified for AMA.
Some photos are attached - enjoy!
Bob Wideman AMA 620650 IMAA 26405 rwideman@uark.edu
|  |  |  |  | |
|
|
|
|